Sick of sick notes? What employees and employers need to know about changes to the BC Employment Standards Act

Sick of sick notes? What employees and employers need to know about changes to the BC Employment Standards Act

For years, BC employees have been playing the game of Sick Note Triathlon: waking up with a sore throat or other symptoms, sprinting to the closest clinic, and waiting behind a dozen other miserable-feeling people to secure a one sentence note excusing them from work. As of November 12, 2025, changes to the BC Employment Standards Act mean this tiring sport has been retired for some short-term medical absences.

For BC employers, these new restrictions on when doctor’s notes can be required have them scrambling to change their policies and processes. The new rule also leaves open questions about what employers can do when there is reason to suspect sick leave abuse.

What are the new rules about sick notes in BC?

The Government of British Columbia has introduced new rules about when employers are permitted to request sick notes for short term medical illnesses. The amendments apply to health-related leaves under the Employment Standards Act, which include absences due to the employee’s own illness or injury as well as the illness or injury of an immediate family member. Note that the amendments only apply to employees who are covered by the Act (for example, certain professions such as lawyers and dentists are excluded).

The change is simple on its face: subject to narrow exceptions, an employer cannot require that an employee provide a sick note for the first two medical absences of five days or less in a calendar year. This protection applies regardless of the type of illness or whether the leave was for the employee or an immediate family member.

The Government’s Policy Interpretation guidelines released with the new rule note that even for the third or subsequent medical absences in a year, if it is a health-related leave under the Act (for example, if it is still within the 8 days sick leave per year protected under the Act), employers are only permitted to request “reasonably sufficient proof.” The guidelines suggest that it is likely not reasonable to request a doctor’s note for a relatively common illness that is short in duration. The Policy Interpretation suggests that a pharmacy receipt for over-the-counter products such as pain medication or verbal or written confirmation from the employee “should likely be sufficient.”

Nowhere in the new rules or Policy Interpretation does the Government address what (if anything) employers can do if they suspect an employee is dishonestly abusing sick leave. For the first two medical absences of five days or less in a year, there is no stated exception for suspected abuse. For the third or subsequent absence, a reasonable suspicion of sick leave abuse may be a basis to require a doctor’s note as “reasonably sufficient proof.”

When can employers ask for doctor’s notes?

After the first two absences in a year, or for any absence of more than 5 consecutive days, a medical note may be requested for health-related leaves under the Act if it is “reasonably sufficient proof” in the circumstances (see above for the Policy Interpretation guidance on this). Sick leaves beyond the protected health-related leaves under the Act are not subject to the “reasonably sufficient proof” restriction and these rules to do not apply.

The Policy Interpretation guideline states that employers are allowed to request medical information, including medical notes, if the information is needed for return to work planning, such as confirmation of fitness to return to work, or to arrange workplace accommodations.

Sick leave entitlements remain the same

Minimum sick leave entitlements still remain the same under the new rules – employees are entitled to a minimum of 5 paid and 3 unpaid sick days per calendar year, provided they have completed 90 consecutive days of employment.

Takeaways for employers, employees and unions

Employers should review their policies to ensure they are compliant with the changes to the Employment Standards Act and ensure management and supervisors are aware of the new restrictions. Many employers have sick leave policies that give the employer discretion to request doctor’s notes for sick leave of any length.  These employer policies are now inconsistent with the Act, and if employees are required to provide doctor’s notes at times prohibited by the new rules, they can file complaints with the Employment Standards Branch.

Employees should be aware of their rights and obligations when taking sick leave. Many employers will not be aware of the new rules, and employees may need educate them about their rights when asked for a doctor’s note.

Unions should review collective agreement language and employer policies to assess compliance and ensure that members and employers are informed of these new restrictions on when medical notes can be required.

This blog is not legal advice and only provides general information. Every situation must be considered on its own facts.

Need legal advice? Contact us [email protected] or 604-535-7063. Our team of employment lawyers in BC and Alberta are ready to answer your questions.

Can You Really Get Sued for Quitting Your Job? Here’s What the Law Says

Can You Really Get Sued for Quitting Your Job? Here’s What the Law Says

Leaving a job can be emotional. For employees, it may mean a fresh start or simply the relief of moving on. For employers, it can cause disruption: scrambling to cover workloads, reassuring clients, and managing change. With so much at stake, we sometimes get asked: can an employee be sued for quitting?

The short answer is yes, it can happen, but only in extraordinary situations. Lawsuits against employees who have resigned are rare. Most lawsuits against resigning employees involve other issues like failure to give notice of resignation, use of confidential information, or solicitation of clients or employees. In most lawsuits against departing employees, the employer has experienced concrete, measurable, financial losses from the employee’s sudden exit.

Do employees have to give notice?

Yes, some advance notice of resignation is legally required. If you are wondering about notice in your specific situation, the first place to check is the employment contract.  Many contracts specify the amount of notice that needs to be provided for resignations.

If there is nothing in the contract, in British Columbia, there is no statutory requirement under the Employment Standards Act for employees to give notice of resignation. That said, employees still have a common law duty to provide “reasonable notice” when leaving a job.

There’s no set number of days for “reasonable notice”, but two weeks has become the cultural norm. For some roles, that’s more than enough. For senior or specialized positions, or fiduciary employees (more on this below) courts may expect more time.

Most claims come up when someone quits without any warning, takes a new role with a competitor, and pulls clients or colleagues along with them. In those cases, an employer might be able to prove they’ve suffered financial harm. A good example of this is in a case that went all the way to the Supreme Court of Canada in 2008: RBC Dominion Securities Inc. v. Merrill Lynch Canada Inc.

For employees, providing reasonable notice under your contract or common law reduces that risk and helps preserve professional relationships. For employers, reasonable notice buys time to transition and plan for the gap.

What about confidential information?

Former employees using confidential information after leaving the organization is a recurring issue that leads to legal battles. Confidential information is basically anything the employee would not have known without working at the organization, this includes trade secrets or client information.

Even if there is no written confidentiality agreement, courts recognize a continuing duty not to misuse information learned during employment. Employees should walk away with their skills and experience, and not with the employer’s records, customer information or strategies. Employers, for their part, should make sure those expectations are clearly set out in employment contracts and workplace policies, and reinforced before and after a resignation.

In short, employees should leave with their coffee mug, family pictures, and the skills they gained, but not with documents or records that belong to the employer. For employers, that means making sure confidentiality obligations are communicated clearly, ideally in writing, and that former employees understand these expectations.

Competing after quitting

Many employees worry they won’t be able to work for a competitor or start their own business after leaving their job. The answer depends on what’s written in the employment contract and the role of the employee.

Non-compete (or non-competition) clauses are sometimes included in contracts, but courts often strike them down if they go beyond what is needed to protect the employers’ legitimate proprietary interests. Non-solicitation clauses, which stop former employees from bringing clients or colleagues over to a new employer, are more likely to hold up if they are reasonable – meaning they’re limited in time, geography, and scope. This is a pretty technical area of the law, and we strongly suggest consulting with an employment lawyer if you are an employee or employer wondering if this kind of clause in a contract could apply to post-employment competition.

If an employee held a position of particular trust and authority, they could be a fiduciary employee. These employees are expected to act with loyalty and good faith even after they resign.  That could include not soliciting clients or employees for a period of time after employment.

Vacation or wage overpayments

Sometimes the dispute between an employer and employee who has quit isn’t about reasonable notice or competition but about money. This can come up when vacation has been taken in advance of accruing it, or if payroll errors leave questions about repayment.

In British Columbia, employers cannot deduct money from an employee’s pay without written consent. An employer could sue to recover an overpayment, but it may not be worthwhile to file a lawsuit over a small sum. Employees who have money withheld without their written consent can file a complaint with the Employment Standards Branch. The practical solution for both sides is to resolve these issues before the last day of work.

 

Bottom Line

So, can you really get sued for quitting? Technically yes, in specific circumstances, but in practice it is rare. Employers generally only pursue legal action if the employee not given notice or otherwise breached their employment contract and the employer has suffered real and significant harm.

For employees, providing reasonable notice and being mindful of confidentiality, non-compete, and/or non-solicitation clauses can avoid trouble in the long run. For employers, it’s far easier to set out clear expectations to a departing employee and address any outstanding issues before they walk out than to deal with it later down the road.

When handled professionally and effectively, resignations can be a clean start of a new chapter rather than the beginning of a painful legal dispute.

 

This blog is not legal advice and only provides general information. Every situation must be considered on its own facts.

Need legal advice? Contact us [email protected] or 604-535-7063. Our team of employment lawyers in BC and Alberta are ready to answer your questions.